![]() | |||||||||||||||||
![]() | |||||||||||||||||
|
In an interview on CNBC, Zoellick said approval of the pact
would give a boost to Jordan's King Abdullah, whose faces
opposition in his country to joining a coalition with the
United States against the perpetrators of last week's deadly
attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
"King Abdullah is trying to support the United States,"
Zoellick said. "We've got to help him in his own country
through trade liberalization."
The U.S.-Jordan Free Trade Agreement, which was negotiated
last year by the Clinton administration, has made slow progress
in Congress this year because of its ground-breaking labor and
environmental provisions that many Republicans oppose.
But Jordanian Ambassador Marwan Muasher told Reuters he
hoped the Senate would approve the pact before Jordan's King
Abdullah visits the United States in the next two weeks.
"We really hope the Senate will finally act on it," Muasher
said. "It would give a tremendous boost both symbolically and
in tangible terms to Jordan."
King Abdullah was en route to Washington for talks with
President George W. Bush last Tuesday, when the attacks in New
York and near Washington canceled his plans.
Under the pact, both countries pledged not to weaken their
labor and environmental laws to attract trade and investment.
That upset Republicans in both the House of Representatives
and Senate, who said the provisions would impinge on U.S.
sovereignty and open the door to trade sanctions.
To mollify those concerns, Muasher exchanged letters with
Zoellick saying neither country intended to use sanctions as an
enforcement tool.
That cleared the way for the Senate Finance Committee and
the House Ways and Means Committee to approve the agreement and
on July 31 the full House gave its okay as well.
Further action has been delayed by Sen. Phil Gramm, who has
threatened to weigh down the pact with controversial amendments
if it goes to the Senate floor for a vote.
A spokesman for Gramm on Tuesday said the senator was
"continuing to try to work out problems with the legislation"
and has not decided what steps he would take if it is brought
to the floor before an agreement can be reached.
"He has a deep and abiding concern about provisions that he
believes impinges on American sovereignty and he's determined
to work those out," the spokesman said.
Muasher declined to say what else could be done to address
Gramm's concerns, but acknowledged discussions were underway.
"We are working with all sides to hopefully get it ratified
soon," he said.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
disclaimer |
|||||||||||||||||